Biden's intelligence advisers recommend reforming FBI access to controversial spying tool posted at 18:14:35 UTC via cyberscoop.com
Biden's intelligence advisers recommend reforming FBI access to controversial spying tool
A board of presidential advisers recommend the White House supports a series of changes to improve compliance with the use of a controversial surveillance program, yet overwhelmingly backs reauthorization of the intelligence gathering tool, according to a report released Monday.
The report comes as Congress debates whether to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is set to expire at the end of the year. Lawmakers are expected to introduce legislation to reform the tool in the coming weeks.
One of the most notable of the 13 recommendations includes removing the FBI’s authority to conduct queries for non-national security-related crimes. “FBI’s use of Section 702 should be limited to foreign intelligence purposes only and FBI personnel should receive additional training on what foreign intelligence entails,” the report notes.
The report from the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board warns that repeated abuse of the spying tool by the FBI to search for the digital communications of U.S. persons has eroded public trust.
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Principal Deputy National Security Advisor Jon Finer said in a joint statement Monday that the Biden administration is reviewing the recommendations. The administration has aggressively lobbied Congress to renew the authority and has suggested support for reform, but has not offered any specific proposals
“We agree with the unanimous conclusion reached by this group of independent, deeply experienced experts that failure to reauthorize Section 702 could be “one of the worst intelligence failures of our time,” Sullivan and Finer said in a statement. “We also agree with the Board’s recommendation that Section 702 should be reauthorized without new and operationally damaging restrictions on reviewing intelligence lawfully collected by the government and with measures that build on proven reforms to enhance compliance and oversight, among other improvements.”
The recommendations heavily focus on the FBI’s use of Section 702, which has come under scrutiny by lawmakers and civil liberties advocates due to a history of documented compliance issues that have resulted in improper spying on Americans, including protestors and political campaigns.
“We agree that Section 702 should be reauthorized in a manner that does not diminish its effectiveness, as well as reassures the public of its importance and our ability to adhere rigorously to all relevant rules,” the FBI said in a statement. “We look forward to engaging with Congress on the recommendations in the PIAB report, and appreciate the Board’s professionalism, expertise, and judgment in conducting this important assessment.”
In addition to FBI reforms, the report recommends establishing under the office of the President, a “centralized, external, independent review mechanism to assess the effectiveness of the entire compliance and oversight system on a regular basis, to ensure that corrective executive action is taken when required.”
The report does not call for a full warrant requirement, something many civil liberties groups want.
“We do not recommend that import because obviously when you’re first assessing whether or not the US person is the victim of a cyber attack or an effort by a Chinese intelligence officer for recruitment, you have no probable cause to believe that that person is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power,” a senior PIAB official told reporters in a call. “So there’s there are legal limitations to getting a warrant each time not to mention the burdensome nature.”
A senior administration official expressed agreement with the conclusion.
“We fundamentally agree … that requiring a court to approve the executive branch’s querying of already lawfully collected information is simply inappropriate and operationally infeasible to deal with time-sensitive national security threats,” the official said.
PIAB report also slammed the government for failing to provide estimates of the “scope and scale” of incidental U.S. person collection, something members of Congress have also expressed concern about.
“The government has not provided a satisfactory explanation to the public for why this task isimpossible nor has it offered what it could in fact estimate to help provide context for the publicabout the scale of U.S. person communications being incidentally collected in this surveillance
program intended to target foreigners located outside the United States,” the report concluded.
Jake Laperruque, deputy director at the Security and Surveillance Project for the Center for Democracy & Technology, said the report is “out of step” with reform discussions in Congress. He said the query reform proposed by the board wouldn’t address the FBI’s improper spying on Americans since in many of the cases of abuse made public in recent months the FBI used foreign intelligence as a justification.
“The reforms proposed in this report are grossly insufficient,” he told CyberScoop.
Updated July 31, 2023: To include additional comments.
In This Story
The Federal Bureau of Investigation improperly searched foreign surveillance information last year using the last names of a U.S. senator and a statelevel politician, according to a court opinion released Friday.
The revelation could toughen the road ahead for the Biden administration as it seeks reauthorization of a contentious surveillance tool known as Section 702, which expires at the end of the year. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have raised privacy concerns about the program and are leveraging the reauthorization to demand changes.
The opinion from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court said an FBI analyst in June 2022 conducted searches of Section 702 data using the last names of a U.S. senator and a state senator “without further limitation.” The court didn’t name the legislators.
“The analyst had information that a specific foreign intelligence service was targeting those legislators, but [National Security Division] determined that the querying standard was not satisfied,” Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote in the opinion, which was completed in April but released on Friday. It was declassified on July 16.
Despite reported errors, Contreras wrote that “there is reason to believe that the FBI has been doing a better job in applying the querying standard.”
Also in 2022, a staff operations specialist also ran a query using the Social Security number of “a state judge who ‘had complained to FBI about alleged civil rights violations perpetrated by a municipal chief of police.’” Section 702 allows the U.S. government to collect the digital communications of foreigners located outside the U.S. But the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has found “persistent and widespread” compliance problems with the FBI’s searches under Section 702.
At a congressional hearing earlier this year, Republican Rep. Darin LaHood of Illinois, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said his name was wrongfully searched in surveillance information. LaHood has since been tapped to lead a bipartisan working group focusing on Section 702’s reauthorization.
The opinion unveiled Friday marks the latest in what could be a drawn-out battle between the Biden administration and lawmakers over the renewal of Section 702.
FBI Director Christopher Wray defended the surveillance tool during a congressional oversight hearing last week, saying the agency only accesses about 3 percent of the total information collected under Section 702. But those arguments fell flat before Republicans, who zeroed in on how it allows U.S. authorities to run warrantless searches for information on Americans.
Senate Judiciary Committee members have told intelligence officials that Section 702 needs more privacy safeguards for Americans.
Judiciary Chair Richard J. Durbin D-Ill., said the surveillance program doesn’t do enough to protect privacy and civil liberties. At a hearing last month, he said he’ll only support the reauthorization of Section 702 if there are “significant reforms.” He also said the changes must include safeguards to prevent future abuses and ensure effective oversight from the courts and Congress.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orthodox Jews are Putin's Jews - Google Search https://t.co/xIUhA96cab https://t.co/VorX5qRJt8
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) August 1, 2023
Putin tells Russian Jews he expects 'hefty contribution' in ...
Putin boasts of Russia's economy, calls Ukraine's ...
What Putin's Treatment of Jews Reveals About Russia
Vladimir Putin attacks Volodymyr Zelenskyy's Jewish heritage
Jews Are Never Safe Under Dictators – and Putin's No ...
Putin: Zelenskyy Is a 'Disgrace' to the Jewish People - Europe
<a href="https://www.haaretz.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.haaretz.com</a> › World News › EuropeJun 16, 2023 — Russian Leaders Have Invoked Antisemitism and Other Conspiracy Theories in the Past to Target Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy and ...
Russia's Jews fear resurgent anti-Semitism amid Ukraine war
Russia's Putin attacks Jewish heritage of Ukraine's Zelensky
Putin and the Jews
The Happy-Go-Lucky Jewish Group That Connects Trump ...
Putin sorry for Lavrov's claim Hitler was part Jewish - Israel ...
Putin Says Zelensky A 'Disgrace To Jewish People'
Putin's Hybrid War and the Jews: Antisemitism ...
Putin's Despicable Attack on Zelensky's Jewish Identity
Putin Says Zelensky a 'Disgrace to Jewish People'
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The News And Times
Comments
Post a Comment