9:45 AM 4/18/2019 - Investigate the investigators! Abolish the FBI! - 7:34 AM 4/18/2019by noreply@blogger.com (Michael Novakhov (Mike Nova)) Thursday April 18th, 2019 at 10:42 AM - The FBI News Review
- Get link
- Other Apps
Investigate the investigators! Abolish the FBI! - 7:34 AM 4/18/2019by noreply@blogger.com (Michael Novakhov (Mike Nova))
The New Yorker
7:34 AM 4/18/2019
Congressional Republicans Vote to Abolish F.B.I.
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
I republish this combined post from my Facebook pages:
Investigate the investigators! Abolish the FBI! Put their turncoats, criminals, and the criminally incompetent Trumpistas, Obamanites, Bushistas, etc., etc., in prison!
Michael Novakhov
FBI News Review
47 mins ·
FBI News Review - By Michael Novakhov:
See: http - fbinewsreview - dot - org.
Investigate the investigators! Save America! Reform the FBI now!
Look it up on Google also, because the stupid greedy Facebook does not publish the direct links. Visit all my blogs and sites: see links at http, etc - newsandtimes-dot-org.
The Facebook's editors and their system of CENSORSHIP are the absolute retards, and that is exactly what the New Abwehr and (their long-time agent) Putin wanted: to restrict the freedom of information on the Internet. It appears that the FBI is the part of this CENSORSHIP, "for security reasons", ostensibly; but in fact because The (Stupid) Dogs just cannot resist poking their bulbous noses into everything that is able to excite their doggy attention.
The Stupid Facebook rejects my posts on the ground that they "do not meet the community standards", while these posts are just the reprints, the copies of the links to the mainstream press articles from the Google searches. The Facebook runs scared and crazy, the FBI terrorized them to death, and into the construction of the virtual Panopticon Observation Prison cum Jewish Mother + glassy-eyed Jewish Accountant pretending to be the Face Of The World and Mr. Very Sociable himself.
Facebook is the very retarded "social marketplace" for their masses of the retarded customers.
47 mins ·
FBI News Review - By Michael Novakhov:
See: http - fbinewsreview - dot - org.
Investigate the investigators! Save America! Reform the FBI now!
Look it up on Google also, because the stupid greedy Facebook does not publish the direct links. Visit all my blogs and sites: see links at http, etc - newsandtimes-dot-org.
The Facebook's editors and their system of CENSORSHIP are the absolute retards, and that is exactly what the New Abwehr and (their long-time agent) Putin wanted: to restrict the freedom of information on the Internet. It appears that the FBI is the part of this CENSORSHIP, "for security reasons", ostensibly; but in fact because The (Stupid) Dogs just cannot resist poking their bulbous noses into everything that is able to excite their doggy attention.
The Stupid Facebook rejects my posts on the ground that they "do not meet the community standards", while these posts are just the reprints, the copies of the links to the mainstream press articles from the Google searches. The Facebook runs scared and crazy, the FBI terrorized them to death, and into the construction of the virtual Panopticon Observation Prison cum Jewish Mother + glassy-eyed Jewish Accountant pretending to be the Face Of The World and Mr. Very Sociable himself.
Facebook is the very retarded "social marketplace" for their masses of the retarded customers.
Und ziz iz my Opini'on.
Michael Novakhov
4:25 AM 4/17/2019
2:39 PM 4/15/2019 - Facebook has to be broken up, just like AT&T was, they became the dangerous social media and communications (!!! - that's what is important) monopoly. Replace it with the non for profit business model, make it better, truly social, and maybe even "socialist", it would fit it to the T.
By Michael Novakhov (Mike Nova) April 16, 2019
Investigate the investigators! Save America! Reform the FBI now!
News, Reviews, Analysis, Opinions
FBI NEWS REVIEW - By Michael Novakhov
FBI is a very sick, Mafia and Nazi style type of the organisation staffed with shrewd but brainless and soulless psychopaths. It has to be studied and researched in depth. Their sick, unlawful, low, cynical, gypsy mentality type "secrets" and "mysteries" have to be exposed and revealed. This stupid, brainless, ever hungry, dysfunctional, ugly Beast feeds on America and her people. They are worse than KGB and Gestapo, and they are stupider too.
Their "hair analysts" gave the wrong testimonies and sent the innocent people to prison simply because they wanted to "make the grade", to please their superiors, and to move up the ladder. Read about it, including my blogs and sites.
They have to be destroyed, abolished, and those who deserve it should be prosecuted themselves. I could not and still cannot believe that all this, including their infamous COINTELPRO "operations" were happening in America!
And in addition to all that, they are simply incompetent and are not able to carry out their duties properly. I also think that the FBI is the major threat to the sanity and the mental health of the American people. The FBI "COINTELPRO specialists" literally and deliberately drive you crazy, and those very talanted artistic nincompoops sincerely believe, in accordance with their limited intellectual capacities, that this is exactly their job to do.
They became the inspiring model for the many monstrous "secret security services" around the world, and lately for the Israeli private spying firms who developed and expanded ad criminal absurdum the COINTELPRO tactics and techniques. Read about those firms activities and interference in 2016 Elections.
Their "hair analysts" gave the wrong testimonies and sent the innocent people to prison simply because they wanted to "make the grade", to please their superiors, and to move up the ladder. Read about it, including my blogs and sites.
They have to be destroyed, abolished, and those who deserve it should be prosecuted themselves. I could not and still cannot believe that all this, including their infamous COINTELPRO "operations" were happening in America!
And in addition to all that, they are simply incompetent and are not able to carry out their duties properly. I also think that the FBI is the major threat to the sanity and the mental health of the American people. The FBI "COINTELPRO specialists" literally and deliberately drive you crazy, and those very talanted artistic nincompoops sincerely believe, in accordance with their limited intellectual capacities, that this is exactly their job to do.
They became the inspiring model for the many monstrous "secret security services" around the world, and lately for the Israeli private spying firms who developed and expanded ad criminal absurdum the COINTELPRO tactics and techniques. Read about those firms activities and interference in 2016 Elections.
And you better investigate all of the above!
Michael Novakhov - 4:51 AM 4/16/2019
Michael Novakhov - 4:51 AM 4/16/2019
Michael Novakhov
@MichaelNovakhov
After I posted this tirade, the stupid FBI panicked and blocked my websites. Thank you, the Great American Democracy and the Great American Freedom of Speech! Thank you Obama, and the rest of you!
@MichaelNovakhov
After I posted this tirade, the stupid FBI panicked and blocked my websites. Thank you, the Great American Democracy and the Great American Freedom of Speech! Thank you Obama, and the rest of you!
P.S. Now my sites are up again; visit them and read my posts and pages!
FBI HAS TO BE ABOLISHED, AND THE CRIMINALS IN THEIR MIDST HAVE TO BE PROSECUTED RELENTLESSLY!
Michael Novakhov
4:03 AM 4/18/2019
__________________________________
Michael Novakhov
4:03 AM 4/18/2019
__________________________________
Read the whole story
· · · · · · ·
President Trump says Russia probe 'con job,' as fuller report looms Chicago Tribune
Donald Trump stepped up his attacks in an effort to undermine potential disclosures on Russia, his 2016 campaign and the aftermath.
House Judiciary Committee considers red flag law — Alabama Political Reporter alreporter.com
The House Judiciary Committee held a public hearing Wednesday for House Bill 265, which would allow a court to order law enforcement to seize a person's ...
... counterintelligence authorities (and other investigative powers) to scrutinize a political campaign – a probe that would not be limited to the FBI and ...
The FBI began receiving Steele's Trump-Russia memos directly. ... shadow on the provenance of the counterintelligence investigation that has hung ...
Congress will get the Mueller report on CDs Washington Examiner
Special counsel Robert Mueller's long-awaited report will be delivered to Congress today on a CD, leaving congressional staffers scrambling to make sure they ...
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2
Here's What We Know So Far About Russia's 2016 Meddling TIME
From hacking the Clinton campaign to spreading propaganda, here's what we know about how Russia meddled in the 2016 election.
What to Watch For Today in the Mueller Report The New York Times
The report by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, covers his investigation into Russian election interference, any ties to the Trump campaign and possible ...
The report by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, covers his investigation into Russian election interference, any ties to the Trump campaign and possible presidential obstruction.
Columbus police disbands vice unit in wake of FBI, internal probes
The Columbus Dispatch-Mar 19, 2019
Columbus police disbands vice unit in wake of FBI, internal probes .... CPD Announces Major Change in Narcotics Bureau-abolishing Vice Section ... In recent weeks, a Columbus police internal-affairs investigation of the July ...
Columbus Police disband vice unit amid investigation
<a href="http://ABC6OnYourSide.com" rel="nofollow">ABC6OnYourSide.com</a>-Mar 19, 2019
<a href="http://ABC6OnYourSide.com" rel="nofollow">ABC6OnYourSide.com</a>-Mar 19, 2019
Now That Robert Mueller Has Finished His Investigation, Can We Stop ...
<a href="http://TeenVogue.com" rel="nofollow">TeenVogue.com</a>-Mar 25, 2019
Now That Robert Mueller Has Finished His Investigation, Can We Stop ... fired FBI director James Comey amid an FBI investigation into whether or not the .... such as the Abolish ICE campaign and addressing police brutality.
Fear of a Black Homeland
The Intercept-Mar 23, 2019
The “black identity extremism” report was prepared by the FBI's Domestic ... The FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on an ..... ranging between universal health care and the abolition of the U.S. Constitution.
How a Movement That Never Killed Anyone Became the FBI's No. 1 ...
The Intercept-Mar 23, 2019
Michael B. Ward of the FBI's counterterrorism division speaks at a press conference on Nov. .... In July 1997, the Associated Press published an investigation .... with abolishing U.S. imperialism,” he wrote in prepared remarks.
Robert Mueller was never going to end Donald Trump's presidency
Vox-Mar 24, 2019
Or ordering FBI Director James Comey to close his investigation into .... We should abolish the filibuster and Electoral College and eliminate ...
Daily Beast
Trump's Treachery Goes Way Beyond Russia
Slate Magazine-Mar 29, 2019
Special counsel Robert Mueller has ended his Russia investigation, and Republicans are ... and fired the FBI director who was investigating that interference. ..... In April 2017, Erdogan won a referendum to abolish Turkey's ...
Mueller investigation: Letters to the editor, March 31, 2019
Fresno Bee-Mar 31, 2019
The Mueller investigation has been completed. ... than a seasoned and well respected former head of the FBI, who just completed a two ... Therefore, I think that Operation Clean Up should either be abolished or stricter rules ...
Read the whole story
· · ·
If that what you wanted, then that's what you got: see my Facebook pages.
Who attacked, hacked, and vandalized my site "http://fbinewsreview.org/"?! The site is fixed. And you will get more.
Michael Novakhov
5:23 AM 4/18/2019
____________________________________
Who attacked, hacked, and vandalized my site "http://fbinewsreview.org/"?! The site is fixed. And you will get more.
Michael Novakhov
5:23 AM 4/18/2019
____________________________________
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3
2:38 AM 4/18/2019 - John Bolton says the Monroe Doctrine is 'alive and well.' - Bolton on Monroe Doctrine
John Bolton Reaffirms America's Commitment to the Monroe Doctrine ...
Observer-10 hours ago
National Security Advisor John Bolton announced new sanctions against ... “Today, we proudly proclaim for all to hear: the Monroe Doctrine is ...
Bolton WARNS Venezuela: Monroe Doctrine 'Alive and Well'
Sputnik International-1 hour ago
National Security Adviser John Bolton has signaled the US administration's readiness to use the Monroe Doctrine in its policy pertaining to ...
Russia Warns Bolton: 'Monroe Doctrine' Remarks Insulting to Latin ...
Mintpress News-Apr 12, 2019
In Doha, Qatar, the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, expressed his outrage over Bolton'sevoking of the 'Monroe Doctrine' now, when ...
Read the whole story
· · · ·
2:26 AM 4/18/2019 - ‘Three Stooges of Socialism’ and other stories
Are you scared yet? Photo: John Springer Collection/Corbis via Getty Images
As his contribution to the Trump administration/GOP Red Scare of 2019–2020, White House national security adviser John Bolton gave a fiery speech to a group of aging Cuban-American veterans of the failed 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, and brought back many memories of those wonderful days of the Cold War. Some of his lines were a bit jarring, truth be told, as Politico’s report indicates:
The Trump administration’s aggressive positioning in the Western Hemisphere was made clear by the national security adviser, who said Wednesday: “We proudly proclaim for all to hear: The Monroe Doctrine is alive and well” — a reference to a policy used in the past to justify interventions in Latin America.
The whole idea of the Monroe Doctrine, of course, was for the United States to resist Eastern Hemisphere (originally Western European) interference with Latin America, a concept that was made ideological when Cuba was a Soviet client state and the Russkies were fomenting revolution elsewhere. Yes, today’s Russia supports Venezuela’s Maduro, Nicaragua’s Ortega, and (not so warmly any more) Cuba’s Díaz-Canel, perhaps for old time’s sake. But it’s not as though it does so as the representative of any sinister (much less Marxist) scheme to subvert the hemisphere, unless neo-Tsarism has a future here, in which case Bolsonaro’s Brazil (which Bolton has lavishly praised) and his friend Trump’s USA are the most likely prospects.
Read the whole story
· · ·
John Bolton Reaffirms America's Commitment to the Monroe Doctrine ...
Observer-10 hours ago
National Security Advisor John Bolton announced new sanctions against ... “Today, we proudly proclaim for all to hear: the Monroe Doctrine is ...
Bolton WARNS Venezuela: Monroe Doctrine 'Alive and Well'
Sputnik International-1 hour ago
National Security Adviser John Bolton has signaled the US administration's readiness to use the Monroe Doctrine in its policy pertaining to ...
Russia Warns Bolton: 'Monroe Doctrine' Remarks Insulting to Latin ...
Mintpress News-Apr 12, 2019
In Doha, Qatar, the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, expressed his outrage over Bolton'sevoking of the 'Monroe Doctrine' now, when ...
Bolton: Trump is Seeking 'First Completely Free Hemisphere' With ...
Washington Free Beacon-4 hours ago
National Security Adviser John Bolton said President Donald Trump is ... The Monroe Doctrine is a principle of American foreign policy from the ...
Washington Examiner
John Bolton Invokes Monroe Doctrine, Once Declared Dead by John ...
Breitbart-Mar 29, 2019
National Security Advisor John Bolton issued a statement from the White House on Friday denouncing Venezuelan dictator for bringing ...
Read the whole story
· · ·
Are you scared yet? Photo: John Springer Collection/Corbis via Getty Images
As his contribution to the Trump administration/GOP Red Scare of 2019–2020, White House national security adviser John Bolton gave a fiery speech to a group of aging Cuban-American veterans of the failed 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, and brought back many memories of those wonderful days of the Cold War. Some of his lines were a bit jarring, truth be told, as Politico’s report indicates:
The Trump administration’s aggressive positioning in the Western Hemisphere was made clear by the national security adviser, who said Wednesday: “We proudly proclaim for all to hear: The Monroe Doctrine is alive and well” — a reference to a policy used in the past to justify interventions in Latin America.
The whole idea of the Monroe Doctrine, of course, was for the United States to resist Eastern Hemisphere (originally Western European) interference with Latin America, a concept that was made ideological when Cuba was a Soviet client state and the Russkies were fomenting revolution elsewhere. Yes, today’s Russia supports Venezuela’s Maduro, Nicaragua’s Ortega, and (not so warmly any more) Cuba’s Díaz-Canel, perhaps for old time’s sake. But it’s not as though it does so as the representative of any sinister (much less Marxist) scheme to subvert the hemisphere, unless neo-Tsarism has a future here, in which case Bolsonaro’s Brazil (which Bolton has lavishly praised) and his friend Trump’s USA are the most likely prospects.
In any event, rattling the old Cold War hobgoblins fits in with the administration’s foreign policy and domestic politics, so Bolton was given free rein to twist and shout: “In all, Bolton announced seven crackdowns and sanctions targeting the governments in Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua,” reported Politico.
He also brought back some contemptuous lines about Maduro, Ortega, and Díaz-Canel as the “troika of tyranny” that he deployed in an earlier South Florida speech last year. “Troika” has a nice Russian ring to it, but seemed a bit derivative of George W. Bush’s famous “axis of evil” (referring to that era’s Republican demon-figures of Iraq, Iran, and North Korea). But another nickname he had for the three leaders is palpably counterproductive: “the three stooges of socialism.”
Someone needs to explain to Bolton and/or his speechwriter that “the Three Stooges” is not an allusion likely to strike fear into the hearts of good patriotic Americans fearing the theft of their priceless heritage of freedom. Perhaps if he wants to make fun of the three leaders, he could compare them to Larry, Moe, and Curly Joe, but the comedians were by no means a “troika of tyranny.”
Get unlimited access to Intelligencer and everything else New York.
Learn More »
Get unlimited access to Intelligencer and everything else New York.
Learn More »
Get unlimited access to Intelligencer and everything else New York.
Learn More »
Rhetorical logic aside, Bolton and his boss are in danger of arousing expectations about Latin America that they may not be willing to meet:
One of the Bay of Pigs veterans who attended Bolton’s speech, Frank de Varona, said he and other Cuban-Americans have liked what they’ve seen from Trump, which is why they backed him in 2016 and will again in 2020. But he wants to see more, starting with Venezuela.“If Trump doesn’t get rid of Maduro somehow by 2020, he’s going to lose a lot of support,” said de Varona, who favors U.S.-led airstrikes in Venezuela in combination with ground troops sent by Colombia and Brazil.
I’m not sure how reviving the specter of yanqui imperialism comports with Trump’s America (meaning strictly God’s Country, the USA) First posture with its noninterventionist subtext. But apparently if it’s useful in keeping Florida in Trump’s column in 2020, the ends justifies the means.
Read the whole story
· · ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 4
Relations between the news side of Fox and its opinion arm have grown more tense since President Donald Trump took office. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images
A president accustomed to friendly coverage from the network has been finding things to complain about of late.
By DANIEL LIPPMAN and ELIANA JOHNSON
Updated
2019-04-17T10:35-0400
Many viewers of Monday night’s Fox News town hall with Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders saw a left-wing candidate in the hot seat on a network known for its tight relationship with President Donald Trump.
But Trump himself saw something else: sinister forces at his favorite news network aligning against him. Trump complained twice about the event on Twitter over the next day, griping about an allegedly pro-Sanders audience and charging that the anchors had sucked up to one of his 2020 rivals.
Story Continued Below
The political class may marvel at Trump’s perceived control over Fox, which liberal critics have likened to a propaganda outlet. But the president’s complaints suggest he’s frustrated that he doesn’t have enough. In particular, Trump has repeatedly aimed Twitter barbs at the network’s news anchors, griping that they are insufficiently enthusiastic about his agenda.
“So weird to watch Crazy Bernie on @Fox News,” Trump tweeted Tuesday morning, the day after Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum hosted Sanders for an hour. “Not surprisingly, @BretBaier and the ‘audience’ was so smiley and nice. Very strange,” he wrote. Trump went on to question why the network had recently hired the former Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile as a political analyst. He complained that the audience had been packed with Sanders fans— something a spokesperson for the network denied—while his supporters were stranded outside, asking: “What’s with @FoxNews?"
Trump is picking at an open wound at Fox. Long-fraught relations between the news side of Fox and its opinion arm have grown more tense in the Trump era, according to people familiar with the network’s dynamics. Some of the network’s news anchors question what they see as the pro-Trump cheerleading of their opinion-driven prime-time colleagues. The opinion hosts say they draw bigger ratings and make more money for the network—and criticize their news colleagues for not breaking news. One prime-time employee also casually referred to the news side of the network as “the resistance."
“I don’t think he views Fox as a monolith. He’s upset with certain personalities on Fox News,” said a former senior White House official.
The official recalled hearing Trump criticize news anchors like Neil Cavuto and Shepard Smith when he worked in the White House. In March, Trump slammed Smith — perhaps the network’s most critical voice when it comes to the president — as Fox’s “lowest rated anchor” and said that he, along with two weekend news hosts, “should be working” at CNN.
As it happens, Smith has also come under fire from perhaps Trump’s top booster at the network, the host Sean Hannity. “I like Shep, but he’s so anti-Trump,” Hannity complained on his radio show in July 2017.
Trump has also come to the rescue of at least one friendly opinion host who he felt was mistreated. Last month, he urged Fox to bring back host Jeanine Pirro from her brief suspension over comments appearing to question the patriotism of a Muslim member of Congress. He also tweeted that the network should “[s]top working soooo hard on being politically correct, which will only bring you down.”
Former White House officials say that — thanks in part to the mostly -fawning coverage Trump has enjoyed from the likes of Hannity and his fellow prime-time hosts Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham — the president, who sometimes spends hours a day watching Fox, has in effect become spoiled and highly sensitive to any unkind words on a network he seeks out as an affirming refuge in a largely hostile media environment.
It’s the “same reason that he thinks everyone at The Washington Post is doing Jeff Bezos’ bidding,” said the same former official. Trump feels that “if you have a strong leader at the top, like Fox does with [co-chairman Rupert] Murdoch that they should just be falling in line and they shouldn’t be any question about this.”
Story Continued Below
Asked for comment on Trump’s relationship with Fox, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told POLITICO: “We expect all of the news to be fair and accurate and not trying to drive the liberal agenda. It’s astonishing that the country is doing so well yet the coverage of the president is 90% negative. ... We just wish the media cared more about the great things happening than they did about attacking the president and palace intrigue.”
Another former White House official noted that Trump has criticized Fox for the network’s coverage of him before, and that he complained about their coverage of his early 2016 presidential campaign, when he thought the network was friendlier to GOP candidates like Sens. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz.
The former official added that the network will inevitably be covering the crowded Democratic primary field as the 2020 campaign occupies more space in the news environment. “Part of it is realizing he’s not the only game in town anymore,” this person said.
While the president is a frequent guest on Fox, he tends to stick to interviews with friendlier personalities like prime-time opinion hosts Hannity and Tucker Carlson, or the network’s “Fox & Friends” morning show, which he watches regularly and where he receives consistently positive coverage. Hannity alone has conducted eight television interviews with the president, more than all other television networks combined.
By contrast, it has been more than 300 days since Baier — considered one of the network’s most balanced figures — landed an interview with the president.
“We’d love to have you on a town hall soon — or even an interview on @SpecialReport — it’s been awhile. We cover all sides,” Baier tweeted in reply to Trump’s complaints about Fox on Tuesday.
A Fox News spokesperson pointed POLITICO to several instances in which the network’s opinion hosts have pushed back on Trump. They include an early 2017 instance when Hannity chided Trump for tweeting too often; a December segment in which Ingraham challenged Trump’s claim that he is already building a border wall, saying, “There’s no wall!”; and "Fox & Friends" host Brian Kilmeade's tweaking of Trump for attacking John McCain after the Arizona senator's death.
Rebutting Trump’s charge that the Sanders town hall audience was improperly picked, FOX News also pointed to the Pennsylvania newspaper The Morning Call, which reported that Fox had “reached out to various political and local groups in the area and mined requests to attend after it publicly announced the event.”
Some former Trump White House officials argued that Trump’s ire poses a threat to the network, which has long been the highest-rated among the cable news channels.
“President Trump’s criticism of Fox News is a clear and present danger for the network,” said Andy Hemming, former rapid response director for the Trump White House. “The president knows Fox News viewers are far more loyal to him than the network, meaning he can push those supporters to more overtly friendly outlets like One America News Network or Newsmax with just a couple of tweets and some extra access. It also goes without saying that the financial implications for these networks are massive.”
Story Continued Below
A Fox spokesperson noted in response that the network’s ratings remain strong and that ratings for the Sanders town hall were the highest yet of any town hall featuring a 2020 Democratic candidate televised by a cable news network, including ones by rivals CNN and MSNBC.
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
Did U.S. President Donald Trump once admit to reading the book Mein Kampf and being an admirer of its author, Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler?
Those are the central claims in an internet meme making the social media rounds since mid-April 2019. The text of the meme purports to quote Trump praising Hitler in a Time magazine interview published in 2002. We found instances of the meme’s being shared on both Twitter and Facebook, including a popular Facebook page titled “Joe P. Kennedy III for President 2020,” which does not appear to be owned or operated by Kennedy himself:
“Reading Mein Kampf in college had a profound affect [sic] on me. Very, very interesting. Of course there were many problems in Germany at the time, they were losers, they lost. But Adolf Hitler, that is to say, I don’t agree with everything he was saying at the time of course but I do respect him. As a leader. Tremendous respect. And I suppose you could say, I try to incorporate some of his teachings into everything I do to this day. In business, my daily life and my politics.”
– Donald J. Trump
(Interview with Time Magazine, 2002)
Not only were we unable to locate an original source for this quote, or evidence that Time magazine even interviewed Trump in 2002, but we see no discernible record of its existence before the meme first surfaced in April 2019. Yet it’s the kind of statement that would have been quoted ad nauseam in the press had Trump said it. No such references exist.
Nor were we able to find isolated instances of Trump praising Mein Kampf or Adolf Hitler in public statements. The cadence and grammar of the passage are Trump-like (“… but I do respect him. As a leader. Tremendous respect.”), but all indications point to it being fabricated.
That said, Trump was quoted in 1990 as saying he was given a copy of Mein Kampf by a friend — though it turned out he was mistaken about which of Hitler’s books had been given to him.
In its September issue that year, Vanity Fair ran a lengthy, unflattering profile of Trump written by Marie Brenner. The subject of Hitler came up in a decidedly strange passage about his alleged ownership of a book containing the Nazi dictator’s speeches called My New Order:
Donald Trump appears to take aspects of his German background seriously. John Walter works for the Trump Organization, and when he visits Donald in his office, Ivana told a friend, he clicks his heels and says, “Heil Hitler,” possibly as a family joke.Last April, perhaps in a surge of Czech nationalism, Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler’s collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Kennedy now guards a copy of My New Order in a closet at his office, as if it were a grenade. Hitler’s speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.“Did your cousin John give you the Hitler speeches?” I asked Trump.Trump hesitated. “Who told you that?”“I don’t remember,” I said.“Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of Mein Kampf, and he’s a Jew.” (“I did give him a book about Hitler,” Marty Davis said. “But it was My New Order, Hitler’s speeches, not Mein Kampf. I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I’m not Jewish.”)Later, Trump returned to this subject. “If I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them.”
To recap, Trump’s then-wife Ivana (from whom he was separated) told people he owned a book of Hitler’s speeches and read from it occasionally; Trump said he was given a copy of Mein Kampf by a Jewish friend (who, in fact, was not Jewish and said the book was My New Order); then Trump refused to acknowledge whether he owned the book and said that if he did, he would never read it.
In a subsequent television interview with Barbara Walters, Trump did acknowledge receiving a copy of My New Order, though he appeared to bristle at the implication that he admired Hitler’s speeches:
WALTERS: In the current issue of Vanity Fair, the author, Marie Brenner, says that you read from Hitler’s collected speeches, My New Order, and that these are speeches that you seem to admire. What’s your reaction? Do you have this book? Do you have these speeches?TRUMP: It is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. A friend of mine sent me a book. A man who I think is Jewish, although I don’t know, sent me a book. It happened to be that book. All of a sudden Marie Brenner somehow found out that he had sent me a book. It is the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen, and I’m probably going to sue Vanity Fair over it.
Trump later called the Vanity Fair article “one of the worst ever written about me.” In an infamous coda to the episode, Trump walked up behind Brenner at a public event and poured a glass of wine down her back (an incident both Trump and Brenner acknowledged happening).
As the evidence stands, no strong case exists for the claim that Trump read or admired Hitler’s Mein Kampf. A quote attributed to him in which he supposedly lauded Mein Kampf and its author was clearly fabricated. It appears, on the other hand, that Trump did (and perhaps still does) own a collection of Hitler’s speeches that a friend presented to him as a gift. According to Vanity Fair, Ivana Trump told her lawyer that her husband kept the book near his bedside and occasionally read from it. Also according to Vanity Fair, however, Trump insisted he had never read it, nor would he.
In a 2016 column for The New York Times, Maureen Dowd reported Trump’s response to questions she asked about both books. “I wondered about ex-wife Ivana telling her lawyer, according to Vanity Fair, that Trump kept a book of Hitler’s speeches by his bed,” Dowd wrote. “Or the talk in New York that in the ’90s he was reading Mein Kampf. Nein, he said. ‘I never had the book,’ he said. ‘I never read the book. I don’t care about the book.'”
It’s unclear which book he was referring to.
Questions about what he read or didn’t read aside, we have yet to stumble upon a verifiable instance of Trump expressing respect or admiration for Adolf Hitler. What we did find is that people (including some close to him) have been insinuating that Trump has an affinity for Hitler for the better part of 30 years, which in and of itself is interesting.
Read the whole story
· · · · · ·
I do support Mr. Barr's intent to investigate the FBI and the other related agencies. And needless to say, it has to be bipartisan, non-political, absolutely objective, and in depth.
Posted by 
MichaelNovakhov on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 2:43pm
MichaelNovakhov on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 2:43pm
I do support Mr. Barr's intent to investigate the FBI and the other related agencies. And needless to say, it has to be bipartisan, non-political, absolutely objective, and in depth.
Trump: 'Investigate the Investigators!' https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-investigate-the-investigators …
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 5
1. Trump from Michael_Novakhov (196 sites): “organized crime and intelligence” – Google News: Deutsche Bank faces action over $20bn Russian money-laundering scheme – The Guardian pic.twitter.com/3VuA0EMTHv
4:41 AM 4/14/2019 - Editorial: Looking into surveillance - Opinion - providencejournal.com Sunday April 14th, 2019 at 5:38 AM
Editorial: Looking into surveillance - Opinion - providencejournal.com - Sunday April 14 th , 2019 at 5:38 AM Editorial: Loo...
Editorial: Looking into surveillance - Opinion - providencejournal.com - Sunday April 14 th , 2019 at 5:38 AM Editorial: Loo...
mikenov on Twitter: How Mueller’s hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short – Reuters dlvr.it/R2qZJ3 pic.twitter.com/gOfVTd7X8w – Trump and Trumpism
mikenov on Twitter: How Mueller’s hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short – Reuters dlvr.it/R2qZJ3 pic.twitter.com/gOfVTd7X8w Spread the love How Mueller’s hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short – Reuters dlvr.it/R2qZJ3 pic.twitter.com/gOfVTd7X8w Posted bymikenov on Monday...
mikenov on Twitter: How Mueller’s hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short – Reuters dlvr.it/R2qZJ3 pic.twitter.com/gOfVTd7X8w Spread the love How Mueller’s hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short – Reuters dlvr.it/R2qZJ3 pic.twitter.com/gOfVTd7X8w Posted bymikenov on Monday...
Mayor Pete Is the Democrats’ Folksy Heartland Hope. Really! – Monday April 15th, 2019 at 3:27 AM – Trump Investigations – trumpinvestigations.net
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions | The New Abwehr Hypothesis of The Operation Trump: A Study In Political Psychology, Political Criminology, and Psychohistory, and as the aid for the General, Criminal and the Counterintelligence Investigations of Dona...
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions | The New Abwehr Hypothesis of The Operation Trump: A Study In Political Psychology, Political Criminology, and Psychohistory, and as the aid for the General, Criminal and the Counterintelligence Investigations of Dona...
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions – Latest Posts – Trump and Trumpism
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions – Latest Posts The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions | Latest Posts RSS Dog RSS Dog –
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions – Latest Posts The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions | Latest Posts RSS Dog RSS Dog –
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 6
Mike
Michael Novakhov
Facebook has to be broken up, just like AT&T was, they became the dangerous social media and communications (!!! - that's what is important) monopoly. Replace it with the non for profit business model, make it better, truly social, and maybe even "socialist", it would fit it to the T. | @mikenov - 39s40 seconds ago - More
Michael Novakhov
Facebook has to be broken up, just like AT&T was, they became the dangerous social media and communications (!!! - that's what is important) monopoly. Replace it with the non for profit business model, make it better, truly social, and maybe even "socialist", it would fit it to the T. | @mikenov - 39s40 seconds ago - More
Mi zinkz zat Booty-booty (my cuti), Bernie, und Harris would make a good menage, if they could only manage, und it lookz like zey will.
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov - Review Of News And Opinions. Mi zinkz zat Booty-booty (my cuti), Bernie, und Harris would make a good menage, if they could only manage, und it lookz like zey will.— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) April 15, 20...
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov - Review Of News And Opinions. Mi zinkz zat Booty-booty (my cuti), Bernie, und Harris would make a good menage, if they could only manage, und it lookz like zey will.— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) April 15, 20...
2:39 PM 4/15/2019 - Facebook has to be broken up, just like AT&T was, they became the dangerous social media and communications (!!! - that's what is important) monopoly. Replace it with the non for profit business model, make it better, truly...
Facebook has to be broken up, just like AT&T was, they became the dangerous social media and communications (!!! - that's what is importan...
Facebook has to be broken up, just like AT&T was, they became the dangerous social media and communications (!!! - that's what is importan...
Mi zinkz zat Booty-booty (my cuti), Bernie, und Harris would make a good menage, if they could only manage, und it lookz like zey will. – Trump Investigations – trumpinvestigations.net
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions | The New Abwehr Hypothesis of The Operation Trump: A Study In Political Psychology, Political Criminology, and Psychohistory, and as the aid for the General, Criminal and the Counterintelligence Investigations of Dona...
The Trump Investigations Blog by Michael Novakhov – Review Of News And Opinions | The New Abwehr Hypothesis of The Operation Trump: A Study In Political Psychology, Political Criminology, and Psychohistory, and as the aid for the General, Criminal and the Counterintelligence Investigations of Dona...
FBI is a very sick, Mafia and Nazi style type of the organisation staffed with shrewd but brainless and soulless psychopaths. It has to be studied and researched in depth. Their sick, unlawful, low, cynical, gypsy mentality type "secrets" and...
Investigate the investigators! Save America! Reform the FBI now! News, Reviews, Analysis, Opinions FBI NEWS REVIEW - By Michael Nova...
Investigate the investigators! Save America! Reform the FBI now! News, Reviews, Analysis, Opinions FBI NEWS REVIEW - By Michael Nova...
The Facebook's editors and their system of CENSORSHIP are the absolute retards, and that is exactly what the the New Abwehr and (their long-time agent) Putin wanted: to restrict the freedom of information on the internet. It appears that the FBI is the part of this CENSORSHIP, "for security reasons", ostensibly; but in fact because The (Stupid) Dogs just cannot resist poking their bulbous noses into everything that is able to excite their doggy attention.
The Stupid Facebook rejects my posts on the ground that they "do not meet the community standards", while these posts are just the reprints, the copies of the links to the mainstream press articles from the Google searches. The Facebook runs scared and crazy, the FBI terrorized them to death, and into the construction of the virtual Panopticon Observation Prison cum Jewish Mother + glassy-eyed Jewish Accountant pretending to be the Face Of The World and Mr. Very Sociable himself.
Facebook is the very retarded "social marketplace" for their masses of the retarded customers.
Und ziz iz my Opini'on.
Michael Novakhov
4:25 AM 4/17/2019
The Stupid Facebook rejects my posts on the ground that they "do not meet the community standards", while these posts are just the reprints, the copies of the links to the mainstream press articles from the Google searches. The Facebook runs scared and crazy, the FBI terrorized them to death, and into the construction of the virtual Panopticon Observation Prison cum Jewish Mother + glassy-eyed Jewish Accountant pretending to be the Face Of The World and Mr. Very Sociable himself.
Facebook is the very retarded "social marketplace" for their masses of the retarded customers.
Und ziz iz my Opini'on.
Michael Novakhov
4:25 AM 4/17/2019
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 7
3:40 AM 4/17/2019 - Yes, investigate the investigators!
Yes, investigate the investigators | News, Sports, Jobs Williamsport Sun-Gazette
Attorney General William Barr dared to use the “s-word.” He said in congressional testimony that the Trump campaign had been spied on by the U.S. governme.
In Senate testimony last week, Attorney General William Barr used the word “spying” to refer to the Obama administration, um, spying on the Trump campaign. Of course, fainting spells ensued, with the media-Democrat complex in meltdown. Former FBI Director Jim Comey tut-tutted that he was confused by Barr’s comments, since the FBI’s “surveillance” had been authorized by a court.
(Needless to say, the former director neglected to mention that the court was not informed that the bureau’s “evidence” for the warrants was unverified hearsay paid for by the Clinton campaign.)
The pearl-clutching was predictable. Less than a year ago, we learned the Obama administration had used a confidential informant — a spy — to approach at least three Trump campaign officials in the months leading up to the 2016 election, straining to find proof that the campaign was complicit in the Kremlin’s hacking of Democratic emails.
As night follows day, we were treated to the same Beltway hysteria we got this week: Silly semantic carping over the word “spying” — which, regardless of whether a judge authorizes it, is merely the covert gathering of intelligence about a suspected wrongdoer, organization or foreign power.
There is no doubt that the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign. As Barr made clear, the real question is: What predicated the spying? Was there a valid reason for it, strong enough to overcome our norm against political spying? Or was it done rashly? Was a politically motivated decision made to use highly intrusive investigative tactics when a more measured response would have sufficed, such as a “defensive briefing” that would have warned the Trump campaign of possible Russian infiltration?
Last year, when the “spy” games got underway, James Clapper, Obama’s director of national intelligence, conceded that, yes, the FBI did run an informant — “spy” is such an icky word — at Trump campaign officials; but, we were told, this was merely to investigate Russia. Cross Clapper’s heart, it had nothing to do with the Trump campaign. No, no, no. Indeed, the Obama administration only used an informant because — bet you didn’t know this — doing so is the most benign, least intrusive mode of conducting an investigation.
Me? I’m thinking the tens of thousands of convicts serving lengthy sentences due to the penetration of their schemes by informants would beg to differ. (Gee, Mr. Gambino, I assure you, this was just for you own good . . .) And imagine the Democrats’ response if, say, the Bush administration had run a covert intelligence operative against Obama 2008 campaign officials, including the campaign’s co-chairman. Surely David Axelrod, Chuck Schumer, The New York Times and Rachel Maddow would chirp that “all is forgiven” once they heard Republicans punctiliously parse the nuances between “spying” and “surveillance”; between “spies” and “informants”; and between investigating campaign officials versus investigating the campaign proper — and the candidate.
The “spying” question arose last spring, when we learned that Stefan Halper, a longtime source for the CIA and British intelligence, had been tasked during the FBI’s Russia investigation to chat up three Trump campaign advisers: Carter Page, George Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis. This was in addition to earlier revelations that the Obama Justice Department and FBI had obtained warrants to eavesdrop on Page’s communications, beginning about three weeks before the 2016 election.
The fact that spying had occurred was too clear for credible denial. The retort, then, was misdirection: There had been no spying on Donald Trump or his campaign; just on a few potential bad actors in the campaign’s orbit.
It was nonsense then, and it is nonsense now.
The pols making these claims about what the FBI was doing might have been well served by listening to what the FBI said it was doing.
There was, for example, then-Director Comey’s breathtaking public testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on March 20, 2017. Comey did not just confirm the existence of a counterintelligence probe of Russian espionage to influence the 2016 election — notwithstanding that the government customarily refuses to confirm the existence of any investigation, let alone a classified counterintelligence investigation. The director further identified the Trump campaign as a subject of the probe, even though, to avoid smearing people, the Justice Department never identifies uncharged persons or organizations that are under investigation. As Comey put it:
“I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts . . .”
Read the whole story
· · · · · ·
Comments
Post a Comment